Daily Development for Monday, May 1, 1995

 

By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
prandolph@cctr.umkc.edu

 

VENDOR/PURCHASER; MUTUAL MISTAKE:  Where buyer acquires property for construction of a residence, and subsequently discovers that property is unsuitable for that purpose because it is in flood plain, buyer may rescind on the basis of mutual mistake.  Reilley v. Richards, 632 N.E.2d 507 (Ohio 1994).  The purchaser seeking rescission was found by the court not to have been negligent in failing to discover that a significant portion of the property was located in a flood-plain because he was deemed an unsophisticated buyer (even though he was an attorney!) and could not have discovered the fact by mere observation of the property. 

 

Further, notably, rescission of the purchase contract in the case was upheld even though the purchase agreement gave the purchaser the right to terminate the purchase contract within a specified period if all "soil...and other site related conditions" were not acceptable.  The buyer had not taken advantage of this provision. The decision was 4-3, with a strong dissent.

 

Comment:  As the dissent points out, at least it ought to be up to the buyer to disclose his purpose carrying out the contract if the buyer intends that frustration of that purpose will justify rescission.  Here, apparently, it would have been possible to build on the site, but location of the residence and, undoubtedly, costs of construction would have been higher than buyer intended.  Further, again as the dissent points out, where parties clearly allocate the risk of a mistake, then there is no mutual mistake excuse.  On the issue of soil suitability the intention of the parties was clear that the buyer had sixty days to identify such problems (the buyer himself had drafted the clause).  It is difficult to see how the court could conclude that the parties intended the risk to remain with the seller after that point.

Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.

Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org

Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.

Daily Developments are posted every workday.

To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Dirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Dirt

For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named "Brokerdirt." But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Brokerdirt

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.

DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/