Daily Development for Friday, February 16, 2000
By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
For Friday, here's a little case with a comforting result.
MORTGAGES; STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: For purposes of statute stating that mortgage must be foreclosed within 15 years of its maturity date, a maturity date is "clearly stated" in the mortgage, even if a specific date is not recited, if the date can be deduced by calculating the terms shown in the mortgage.
DeSalle v. Gibraltar Title Agency L.L.C., 621 N.W.2d. 31 (Minn.App. 2000).
Gibraltar Title Agency missed a mortgage when it searched title for a sale from the Bollas to Pamela DeSalle. The mortgagees, the Niskas, brought a foreclosure in 1999. Ms. DeSalle sued Gibraltar for a judgment equal to the amount due under the mortgage. Gibralter defended against the foreclosure by asserting that the Niskas had not foreclosed within the 15year time period. The Niska mortgage did not recite a maturity date. It was recorded in 1982. DeSalle argued that, because no maturity was stated, the right to foreclose the mortgage expired 15 years after it was executed.
The trial court granted summary judgment to DeSalle. It relied on Minn.Stat. 541.03, which says that the 15year limit "shall begin to run from the date of such mortgage, unless the time of the maturity of the debt or obligation secured by such mortgage shall be clearly stated in such mortgage."
On appeal, the Niskas pointed to Polish Union of the U.S. of N. America v. Kruszewski, 213 N.W. 913 (Minn. 1927), which held that the mortgage contained a maturity date when, by reading its terms, one could deduce the date. The Niska mortgage was not as straightforward as Kruszewski, which called for 10 semiannual payments. However, the appeals court found that one could determine the Niska maturity date with "a preprinted amortization schedule or computer software," and that was sufficient. Comment: Don't try this at home, kids. This mortgagee got lucky. The best practice, usually, is to set forth the note as an exhibit to the mortgage. This not only gives a permanent memorial of the note intended to be secured, it eliminates any uncertainty about compliance with statutory requirements for describing the debt.
Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.
Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org
Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.
ABOUT DIRT:
DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.
Daily Developments are posted every workday.
To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Subscribe Dirt [your name] |
To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Signoff Dirt |
For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named "Brokerdirt." But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name] |
To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Signoff Brokerdirt |
DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at: http://cctr.umkc.edu/dept/dirt/