[DIRT] DD 2/2/09 Landlord's double rent claim a winner for late opening by tenant.

Daily Development for Tuesday, February 2, 2010
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Husch Blackwell Sanders
Kansas City, Missouri
dirt@umkc.edu

LANDLORD/TENANT; LANDLORD’S REMEDIES; LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: “LATE OPENING CHARGE;  A late-opening charge in a commercial lease is not an unenforceable penalty where the actual damages to the landlord are difficult to ascertain, the charge is reasonable with respect to the potential injuries, and the charge is applied on a daily basis rather than in a single lump sum.  CPMI, Inc. v. Kolaj, 885 N.Y.S.2d 496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009) (Michigan Law)

Defendant tenant ("Tenant") entered into two commercial leases (the "Leases") with plaintiff managing agent ("Managing Agent"), which Leases were to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan.  The Leases imposed a "late-opening charge" on Tenant in the event that the restaurant that was to be operated at the leased premises was not opened within 120 days after execution of the Leases.  For each day after the expiration of this 120-day period that the restaurant was not opened, Tenant was obligated to pay Managing Agent 1/360 of the annual rent. 

Tenant did not open the restaurant until 6 months after the expiration of the 120-day period and, as a result, Managing Agent demanded a late-opening charge of $40,869.39 from Tenant.  Tenant failed to pay this charge and ultimately vacated the leased premises prior to the expiration of the Leases. 

Managing Agent brought an action against Tenant for breach of the Leases.  The lower court found in favor of the Managing Agent and awarded Managing Agent damages for unpaid rent and the late-opening charge.  Tenant appealed the decision of the lower court on the grounds that the late-opening charge was an unenforceable penalty, but the appellate court affirmed.

Michigan law provides that a liquidated damages clause is appropriate where actual damages are difficult to ascertain, and such a clause is not an unenforceable penalty if "the amount stipulated is reasonable with relation to the possible injury suffered" and "is not unconscionable or excessive."  The appellate court found that the potential injuries to Managing Agent as a result of the delay - including "dark space" in the retail complex of which the leased premises were a part, maintenance problems and diminished traffic, sales, reputation, value and leasing, mortgage refinancing and sale opportunities with respect to the retail complex - were difficult to quantify so a liquidated damages clause was appropriate.  The appellate court held that the late-opening charge was reasonable in relation to these possible injuries and was not excessive given that it was applied on a daily basis rather than as a single lump sum.  Therefore, the late-opening charge was not an unenforceable pe
nalty and Tenant was obligated to pay Managing Agent the stipulated amount.
Comment: Not every “double rent” liquidated damages clause is upheld.  The landlord’s lawyers did a pretty good job of detailing how injurious the tenant’s failure to open his pizza restaurant would be to the landlord’s business operations.  The tenant didn’t show up, apparently, with much firepower to resist.  But the special feature to note was the court’s acceptance of the notion that the day to day nature of the charge made it less onerous.  Hmmmm. 


Items reported here and in the ABA publications
are for general information purposes only and
should not be relied upon in the course of
representation or in the forming of decisions in
legal matters.  The same is true of all
commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT
list.  Accuracy of data and opinions expressed
are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor or
individual contributors and are in no sense the
publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a
source that is readily accessible by members of
the general public, and should take that fact
into account in evaluating confidentiality
issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious
real estate professionals. Message volume varies,
but commonly runs 5 to 15 messages per work day.

DIRT Developments are posted periodically, as supply dictates.

To subscribe, send the message

subscribe Dirt [your name]

to

listserv@listserv.umkc.edu

To cancel your subscription, send the message
signoff DIRT to the address:

listserv@listserv.umkc.edu

for information on other commands, send the message
Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only
commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon
residential real estate matters.  Because real estate brokers generally find
this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.”  But residential
specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the
residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list.  If you
subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as
BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message

subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]

to

listserv@listserv.umkc.edu

To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the message
signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:

listserv@listserv.umkc.edu

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and
the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School
of Law.  Daily Developments are copyrighted by
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC
School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants
permission for copying or distribution of Daily
Developments for educational purposes, including
professional continuing education, provided that
no charge is imposed for such distribution and
that appropriate credit is given to Professor
Randolph, any substitute reporters, DIRT, and its sponsors.

All DIRT Developments, and scores of other cases, arranged topically, are reported in hardcopy form in the ABA Quarterly Report.  This is a limited subscription service, available to ABA Section Members, ACMA members and members of the NAR.   Qualified subscribers may Subscribe to this Report ($30 for Two Years) by Sending a Check to Ms. Bunny Lee, ABA Section on Real Property, Trust & Estate Law, 321 N. Clark Street, Chicago, Il 60610. Contact Bunny Lee  at (312) 988-5651, Leeb@staff.abanet.org   ABA members also can access prior and current editions of this report on the ABA RPTE section website.

DIRT has a WebPage at:
http://dirt.umkc.edu/

-----