Daily Development for Monday, January 19, 2009
by:
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of
Law
Of Counsel: Husch Blackwell Sanders
Kansas City,
Missouri
dirt@umkc.edu
NOTARIES; FEES; RECORDATION OF NOTARIAL ACTS:
Title company notarites could not charge statutory $2 fee for notarization of
documents if they did not further record the relevant notarial information in
their notarial journals.
Finnegan v Old Republic Title Insuranc Co.
of St. Louis, 246 S.W. 3d 948 (Mo. 2008)
Plaintiffs participated in the
carrying out of various real estate transactions through several different title
insurance companies. In each case, it appeared, the closing statements
charged plaintiffs $2 per notarization as part of the costs of the
transaction.
The statute permitted a $2 fee where a notary both notarized
a signature and “properly recorded the notarial act in their notary
journal.” Otherwise only a $1 charge was permitted for an act of notarial
service.
The notaries were employees of the involved title
companies. In addition to the fee refund, the plaintiffs argued
unjust enrichment and a violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices
Act. The basic statute provides that the employer is liable if the
employee notary acted within the scope of employment and the employer
consented. The court noted that the court below had granted summary
judgment for the title companies based upon a misconstruction of the statute
(which now was reversed) so the question of employer consent was a factual
issue. Good luck with that one.
Comment 1: This was not styled as a
class action, but the plaintiffs took the case to the Missouri Supreme Court,
one assumes for more than the $30 or $40 in overcharges. So we may see
more of this issue over time.
Comment 2: The author is unaware of
whether to keep a journal is a common practice among title company
closers. There were four companies and different closing officers involved
here, suggesting that it was a common practice at the time in St. Louis.
The sums are small, but can some trial lawyer pump this issue into
something?
Items reported here and in the ABA publications
are
for general information purposes only and
should not be relied upon in the
course of
representation or in the forming of decisions in
legal
matters. The same is true of all
commentary provided by contributors to
the DIRT
list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed
are the sole
responsibility of the DIRT editor
and are in no sense the publication of the
ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a
source that is
readily accessible by members of
the general public, and should take that
fact
into account in evaluating confidentiality
issues.
ABOUT
DIRT:
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious
real estate
professionals. Message volume varies,
but commonly runs 5 to 15 messages per
work day.
Daily Developments are posted every work day.
To
subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your
name]
to
listserv@listserv.umkc.edu
To cancel your
subscription, send the message
signoff DIRT to the
address:
listserv@listserv.umkc.edu
for information on other
commands, send the message
Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an
alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only
commercial and
general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon
residential
real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find
this
service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But
residential
specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others
interested in the
residential market will want to subscribe to this
alternative list. If you
subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary
also to subscribe to DIRT, as
BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition
to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the
message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your
name]
to
listserv@listserv.umkc.edu
To cancel your
subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the message
signoff BrokerDIRT to the
address:
listserv@listserv.umkc.edu
DIRT is a service of the
American Bar Association
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law
and
the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School
of Law. Daily
Developments are copyrighted by
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law,
UMKC
School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants
permission for copying
or distribution of Daily
Developments for educational purposes,
including
professional continuing education, provided that
no charge is
imposed for such distribution and
that appropriate credit is given to
Professor
Randolph, any substitute reporters, DIRT, and its
sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at:
https://test.exchange.umkc.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://cctr.umkc.edu/dept/dirt/