I put this one up because of the numerous questions I got about the DD a few days ago where a Massachusetts town lost an adverse possession case and the court did not mention the "public purpose" disability. Presumably Massachusetts follows a rule similar to the New York doctrine followed here.
Daily Development for Thursday, May 22, 2003
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
ADVERSE POSSESSION; DISABILITY RE PUBLIC
PROPERTY: Adverse possession claim is viable on land owned by
city and not designated by the city for public use.
Eller Media Company v. Bruckner Outdoor Signs, Inc., 753
28 (A.D. 1 Dept. 2002).
In 1957, the City of New York obtained title to the subject
means of a tax sale. The claimant constructed a billboard on the property
in 1980, surrounded by a six foot high chain link fence, and since that
time had rented the property to various billboard tenants.
The court noted that New York has certain statutory
adverse possession, as well as common law requirements, and that the
claimant in this case had satisfied all of them by constructing a valuable
improvement on the property, erecting a fence, and maintaining all as an
open and notorious unpermitted possession
The court acknowledged that certain public property is not
adverse possession. In New York, however, public agencies may invoke
this rule only as to property held for a public purpose. Under the New
York Administrative Code, property acquired by the City through tax
foreclosure is presumed to be held for public purpose for three years,
after which it loses the benefit of that presumption unless the City
designates it specifically for public use.
The presumption of public use, which lasts 3 years from the
time the city
acquired the property, had expired in 1960 - about the time the billboard
use began - [a mere coincidence?] and since then the city had not
declared that it owned the property for public use.
Comment: Different jurisdictions have different rules on the
protect all public property from adverse possession. Others, as here,
apply that protection only to property held for "governmental" as
opposed to "proprietary purposes."
Readers are encouraged to respond to or criticize this posting.
Items reported on DIRT and in the ABA publications related to it are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data provided and opinions expressed by the DIRT editor the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to
source that is readily accessible by members of
the general public, and should take that fact
into account in evaluating confidentiality
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious
real estate professionals. Message volume varies,
but commonly runs 5 - 15 messages per work day.
Daily Developments are posted every work day.
subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your name]
To cancel your subscription, send the message
signoff DIRT to the address:
for information on other commands, send the
Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes
commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]
To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the
signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:
DIRT is a service of the American Bar
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and
the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School
of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC
School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants
permission for copying or distribution of Daily
Developments for educational purposes, including
professional continuing education, provided that
no charge is imposed for such distribution and
that appropriate credit is given to Professor
Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at:
Members of the ABA Section on Real Property,
and Trust Law or of the National Association of Realtors can subscribe to a quarterly hardcopy report that includes all DIRT Daily Developments, many other cases, and periodic reviews of real estate oriented literature and state legislation by contacting Antonette Smith at (312) 988 5260 or email@example.com