Daily Development for
Monday, November 13, 2000
By: Patrick A. Randolph,
Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
randolphp@umkc.edu
LANDLORD/TENANT; TENANT'S
REMEDIES; LOST PROFITS: In circumstances of fire casualty, a commercial tenant
may be awarded estimated lost profits for a landlord's wrongful termination of
its leasehold interest during rebuilding.
Joe Garavelli's
Restaurant, Inc. v. Colonial Square Associates, L.P., 21 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct.
App. E.D. 2000)
The plaintiff, a
restauranteur who had operated in defendant's shopping center for six years,
suffered a substantial fire casualty, upon which landlord exercised its right
under the lease to terminate. That lease is not the subject of the instant
dispute; rather, this litigation arose over the terms of a second lease which
the parties subsequently executed to provide for rebuilding and a five year
lease term (plus a five-year option period), with rent commencing upon plaintiff's
re-opening of its restaurant after the completion of the reconstruction.
The terms of the second
lease provided, in pertinent part, that the parties would exchange building
plans (restaurant, together with a building wing connection to the shopping
center) and that either party could terminate in the event that an agreement
could not be reached on the scope and quality of the proposed reconstruction.
In accordance with this
provision, the parties prepared and exchanged plans. Disagreements arose over
the timing of the parties' individual work responsibilities, and landlord
proposed that the plaintiff-tenant's rent commence on an earlier date and that
it assume responsibility for a portion of the shopping center connection and
extra cost items. When the tenant's counsel indicated that instead the tenant
would perform in accordance with the existing lease provisions, the landlord
terminated the lease.
The Court of Appeals found
that these disagreements and landlord's subsequent lease termination were not
based upon the scope or the quality of the work, but were based upon additional
proposals by the landlord outside the terms of the lease, making its
termination wrongful and landlord liable for breach of contract.
Tenant produced evidence
of profitability over the years of its operations under its first lease, which
the Court also accepted and affirmed the trial court's judgment award to
tenant. Tenant had met the requirements
for recovery of lost profits under Missouri law, which provides for the
demonstration "a reasonable probability that future operations will be
profitable."
Reporter's Comment: The
interesting twists in this case, of course, are the facts of the fire casualty,
that tenant was not operating its business at the time of the termination, and
that its future profits were proven on a former lease in a former premises. The
recovery by tenant of lost profits for not only the upcoming lease term, but
for the subsequent option to extend the term of the lease, demonstrates a
fairly strong showing for tenant's rights under such circumstances.
Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily
development or the editor's comments about it.
Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the
Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the
Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal.
For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and
bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6,
published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to
the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312)
988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org
Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information
purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or
in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all
commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and
opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no
sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily
accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into
account in evaluating confidentiality issues.
ABOUT DIRT:
DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals.
Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.
Daily Developments are posted every workday.
To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Subscribe Dirt [your name] |
To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Signoff Dirt |
For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv
address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only
commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential
real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service
more valuable, it is named “Brokerdirt.” But residential specialist attorneys,
title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will
want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it
is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT
traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name] |
To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:
To: |
ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu |
Subject: |
[Does not matter] |
Text in body of message |
Signoff Brokerdirt |
DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property,
Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law.
Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of
Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying
or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including
professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such
distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT,
and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/