Daily Development for Monday, November 13, 2000

By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
randolphp@umkc.edu

LANDLORD/TENANT; TENANT'S REMEDIES; LOST PROFITS: In circumstances of fire casualty, a commercial tenant may be awarded estimated lost profits for a landlord's wrongful termination of its leasehold interest during rebuilding.

Joe Garavelli's Restaurant, Inc. v. Colonial Square Associates, L.P., 21 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. E.D. 2000)

The plaintiff, a restauranteur who had operated in defendant's shopping center for six years, suffered a substantial fire casualty, upon which landlord exercised its right under the lease to terminate. That lease is not the subject of the instant dispute; rather, this litigation arose over the terms of a second lease which the parties subsequently executed to provide for rebuilding and a five year lease term (plus a five-year option period), with rent commencing upon plaintiff's re-opening of its restaurant after the completion of the reconstruction.

The terms of the second lease provided, in pertinent part, that the parties would exchange building plans (restaurant, together with a building wing connection to the shopping center) and that either party could terminate in the event that an agreement could not be reached on the scope and quality of the proposed reconstruction.  

In accordance with this provision, the parties prepared and exchanged plans. Disagreements arose over the timing of the parties' individual work responsibilities, and landlord proposed that the plaintiff-tenant's rent commence on an earlier date and that it assume responsibility for a portion of the shopping center connection and extra cost items. When the tenant's counsel indicated that instead the tenant would perform in accordance with the existing lease provisions, the landlord terminated the lease.

The Court of Appeals found that these disagreements and landlord's subsequent lease termination were not based upon the scope or the quality of the work, but were based upon additional proposals by the landlord outside the terms of the lease, making its termination wrongful and landlord liable for breach of contract.

Tenant produced evidence of profitability over the years of its operations under its first lease, which the Court also accepted and affirmed the trial court's judgment award to tenant.  Tenant had met the requirements for recovery of lost profits under Missouri law, which provides for the demonstration "a reasonable probability that future operations will be profitable."  

Reporter's Comment: The interesting twists in this case, of course, are the facts of the fire casualty, that tenant was not operating its business at the time of the termination, and that its future profits were proven on a former lease in a former premises. The recovery by tenant of lost profits for not only the upcoming lease term, but for the subsequent option to extend the term of the lease, demonstrates a fairly strong showing for tenant's rights under such circumstances.

Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.

Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org

Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.

Daily Developments are posted every workday.

To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Dirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Dirt

For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named “Brokerdirt.” But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Brokerdirt

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.

DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/