Daily Development for Thursday, October 21, 2004
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin Kansas City, Missouri email@example.com
LANDOWNER LIABILITY; POST TRANSFER LIABILITY; UNKNOWN DEFECTS: Absent concealment, prior owner of real property is not liable for injuries caused by defective condition on property after ownership was relinquished, even if prior owner negligently created condition.
Lewis v Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 119 Cal. App. 4th 690, 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 636 (2004)
In 1992, Chevron sold property to Berlex. In 2000, a hot water pipe burst on the property, injuring Lewis. Lewis sued Chevron, among others, for negligence and premises liability. Chevron successfully moved for summary judgment on the grounds that it had nothing to do with the property for eight years.
The court of appeal affirmed, holding that, absent concealment, a prior owner of real property is not liable for injuries caused by a defective condition on the property long after the owner has relinquished ownership and control, even if the prior owner negligently created the condition. The court explained that Chevron, as a seller of real property, was not liable for the injuries that occurred after Berlex took possession and that were caused by a dangerous condition that existed at the time the buyer took possession. This rule applies whether the defect is patent or latent. The court noted that Chevron had no ability to inspect or test the pipe, to prevent injuries, or insure itself against any failure. The court opined that Chevron could be liable only if it knowingly concealed a dangerous condition. Because there was no evidence that Chevron knew of a defect in the pipe and deliberately concealed that defect, Chevron could not be liable for Lewis's injuries.
Reporter’s Comment: Caveat emptor can be an extremely comforting doctrine. As long as an owner is unaware of the defects that exist in the property she is selling, the sale will preclude liability for those defects (perhaps subject to a secondary caveat regarding liability for cleanup of toxic waste; but even there the situation described probably comes within an "innocent landowner" exception) [the Editor isn’t sure of that conclusion, but never mind.]. The comfort, however, arises only when it is least needed. The owner who knows of the dangerous condition and either lies about it or intentionally fails to disclose it will be liable long after the sale-not merely to her own buyer, but to successor owners as well when it is finally discovered. See Bernhardt, You Can Sell But You Can't Hide, 18 CEB RPLR 182 (May 1995). Furthermore, she faces liability for any personal injuries that result from the failure to disclose, even when the victim is a remote nonproperty owner (such as th e contractor's employee in Lewis). Thus, caveat emptor only works for some defects.
Preston v Goldman 42 Cal. 3d 108, 227, Cal. Rptr. 817 (1986) , much discussed in the Lewis opinion, did involve a condition that was known to the sellers, but because it was visible, it was also known to the buyers, which makes the situation legally the same as if it had been disclosed to them. The seller may incur post-sale liability only when the defect is latent and known only to the seller. Perhaps a discovery by the next owner before the condition causes any personal harm might terminate the original seller's liability risk, although liability for the reduced value of the property should still remain intact (under CC §3343; see Bernhardt, On Making and Breaking Contracts, 27 CEB RPLR 12 (Jan. 2004)).
If your clients are selling their property, you can tell them that they don't have to repair everything that doesn't work, but they do have to disclose everything that wasn't repaired (and maybe even report the disrepairs they think they fixed).
The Reporter for this case was Roger Bernhardt of the Golden Gate Law School, San Francisco, writing in the California Real Property Reporter. Reprinted with permission.
Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 15 messages per work day.
Daily Developments are posted every work day. To subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your name]
To cancel your subscription, send the message signoff DIRT to the address:
for information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]
To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the message signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:
DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at:
To be removed from this mailing list, send an email message to firstname.lastname@example.org with the text SIGNOFF BROKERDIRT.
Please email email@example.com if you run into any problems.
See <http://www.umkc.edu/is/cs/listserv/unsubscribing.htm> for more information.