Daily Development for Tuesday, October 20, 2009
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Husch Blackwell Sanders
Kansas City, Missouri
MORTGAGES; FORECLOSURE; AVOIDANCE OF SALE: Where a foreclosure sale takes place after a mortgagor and a mortgagee have entered into a forbearance agreement and have agreed to set aside any foreclosure sale, the wrongful foreclosure sale should be set aside and the down payment returned to the successful bidder. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Ray, 880 N.Y.S.2d 454 (Sup. 2009).
The New York Supreme Court (the “Court”) entered a judgement on June 7, 2005 to foreclose a mortgage encumbering real property (the “Property”) belonging to the defendant (“Mortgagor”) and scheduled a foreclosure sale for April 17, 2008.
On April 16, 2008, Mortgagor paid the plaintiff, its mortgage lender (“Mortgagee”), $4,000.00 and was told by Mortgagee that the foreclosure sale would be cancelled and that a forbearance agreement would be prepared whereby Mortgagor would be given the opportunity to pay the arrears owing under her mortgage.
The following day, the Property was nevertheless sold in a foreclosure sale to the successful bidder (the “Successful Bidder”) for a price that was below the appraised value of the Property, and a down payment was tendered by the Successful Bidder to the referee (the “Referee”).
The Court found that although Mortgagor did not follow the redemption procedures mandated by Section 1341 of New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, other factors in the case compelled the Court to set aside the foreclosure sale. The Court cited Guardian Loan Co. Inc. v. Early, 47 N.Y.2d (1979), where the mere inadequacy of the purchase price did not furnish sufficient grounds for vacating a foreclosure sale, but relief could be granted by a court where one of the categories integral to the invocation of equity, such as mistake, was shown. In this case, the Court noted that in addition to the fact that Mortgagee agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with Mortgagor (which agreement Mortgagor relied upon) and to accept payment from Mortgagor (which payment Mortgagee did accept), (i) Mortgagee mistakenly failed to notify the Referee that it had accepted payment from Mortgagor and (ii) Mortgagor had notified the Successful Bidder of her arrangement with Mortgagee
on the day of the foreclosure sale.
In vacating the foreclosure sale and directing the return of the down payment to the Successful Bidder, the Court also noted that “[a]t a time when homeowners are struggling to keep their homes without the financial means to do so, this homeowner was able to tender the money, without a bailout, to save her home... [I]f ever there was a case for equity, this is it.”
Comment: Note that there was no bona fide purchaser relying on the foreclosure because mortgagor herself had informed the bidder that a deal had been made. It’s not clear whether she would have won notwithstanding this information, but it certainly was in her insterest to be proactive in this way.
Items reported here and in the ABA publications
are for general information purposes only and
should not be relied upon in the course of
representation or in the forming of decisions in
legal matters. The same is true of all
commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT
list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed
are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor or
individual contributors and are in no sense the
publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a
source that is readily accessible by members of
the general public, and should take that fact
into account in evaluating confidentiality
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious
real estate professionals. Message volume varies,
but commonly runs 5 to 15 messages per work day.
DIRT Developments are posted periodically, as supply dictates.
To subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your name]
To cancel your subscription, send the message
signoff DIRT to the address:
for information on other commands, send the message
Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only
commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon
residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find
this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But residential
specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the
residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you
subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as
BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]
To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the message
signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:
DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and
the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School
of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC
School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants
permission for copying or distribution of Daily
Developments for educational purposes, including
professional continuing education, provided that
no charge is imposed for such distribution and
that appropriate credit is given to Professor
Randolph, any substitute reporters, DIRT, and its sponsors.
All DIRT Developments, and scores of other cases, arranged topically, are reported in hardcopy form in the ABA Quarterly Report. This is a limited subscription service, available to ABA Section Members, ACMA members and members of the NAR. Qualified subscribers may Subscribe to this Report ($30 for Two Years) by Sending a Check to Ms. Bunny Lee, ABA Section on Real Property, Trust & Estate Law, 321 N. Clark Street, Chicago, Il 60610. Contact Bunny Lee at (312) 988-5651, Leeb@staff.abanet.org ABA members also can access prior and current editions of this report on the ABA RPTE section website.
DIRT has a WebPage at: