Daily Development for Friday, September 10, 2004
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin Kansas City, Missouri firstname.lastname@example.org
HOUSING; EVICTION; “ZERO TOLERANCE” POLICY; PRIOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY: Where a tenant in public housing allows a guest with a prior criminal history to reside in her unit, the housing authority has no right to terminate tenant’s lease if the guest does not engage in criminal activity during the lease term.
Wellston Housing Authority v. Murphy, 131 S.W.3d 378 (Mo.App. E.D. 2004). I
Defendant, a tenant in a public housing apartment building, allowed an individual who had felony convictions and had been recently released from prison to reside in her unit as a guest. The guest’s criminal history included convictions for second degree murder, sexual assault, and burglary.
The housing authority became aware of the criminal history of the guest, and when tenant applied for tenant status for the guest and it otherwise became plain that this was more than an overnight visitor, the authority served tenant with an eviction notice based on the tenant’s violation of the terms of her lease. The lease included a provision consistent with 42 U.S.C. section 1437d(l)(6), which requires public housing leases to “provide that any criminal activity that threatens the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants or any drug-related criminal activity on or off such premises, engaged in by a public housing tenant, any member of the tenant’s household, or any guest or other person under the tenant’s control, shall be cause for termination of tenancy”.
Defendant refused to vacate the premises and the housing authority filed an unlawful detainer action against defendant. Finding for the defendant, the Court held that the criminal activity that serves as the basis for the termination of a pubic housing lease must not be remote in time to the lease itself, but must occur when the lease is in effect, and thus the housing authority’s termination of the lease was improper.
In a separate opinion, the Presiding Judge, while concurring in the result reached by the majority, stated that it was not necessary for the Court to adopt a bright-line test that limits “criminal activity” to conduct during the term of the lease, and that the Court need not decide whether, on different facts, past criminal conduct of a guest might be sufficient to justify termination of a tenant’s lease in a case where there was evidence that the guest caused a current threat to the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants.
Comment: In HUD v. Rucker, 2002 WL 272444 (U.S.S.Ct. 4/01/02) U.S. Supreme Court upheld the interpretation of federal housing statutes that authorizes, but does not require, expulsion of any tenant if guests or children of that tenant possess or traffic in drugs, regardless of personal knowledge or involvement of the tenant. This policy applies even if the criminal conduct occurred off premises.
Note that here the Authority, apparently within its rights, had forbade the defendant’s guest from coming on the premises at all. There appears to be little doubt that it had the power and lawful cause to prohibit a party with a history of violent crimes to come into its housing project. The only question here is whether it can exercise the right to evict as a punishment to another party, who had no criminal record, for bringing the barred party onto the premise before the bar went into effect. Looked at from that perspective, the court likely made an appropriate interpretation of the lease, notwithstanding the strong policies enunciated in Rucker.
Readers are encouraged to respond to or criticize this posting.
Items reported on DIRT and in the ABA publications related to it are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data provided and opinions expressed by the DIRT editor the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 - 15 messages per work day.
Daily Developments are posted every work day. To subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your name]
To cancel your subscription, send the message signoff DIRT to the address:
for information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]
To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the message signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:
DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at:
Members of the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate and Trust Law or of the National Association of Realtors can subscribe to a quarterly hardcopy report that includes all DIRT Daily Developments, many other cases, and periodic reviews of real estate oriented literature and state legislation by contacting Antonette Smith at (312) 988 5260 or email@example.com
To be removed from this mailing list, send an email message to firstname.lastname@example.org with the text SIGNOFF BROKERDIRT.
Please email email@example.com if you run into any problems.
See <http://www.umkc.edu/is/cs/listserv/unsubscribing.htm> for more information.