Daily Development for Friday, September 30, 2005
by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
LANDLORD/TENANT; ASSIGNMENTS AND SUBLETS; BANKRUPTCY: Landlord cannot terminate assignee's lease because of assignor's bankruptcy where assignment occurred prior to assignor's bankruptcy.
Staples, Inc. v. Moses, 2005 NY Slip Op 51376U; (Sup. Ct. of New York, New York County, July 13, 2005).
The tenant ("Original Tenant") had assigned its interest in the lease in 1992 (with the consent of the landlord) to Staples, Inc. ("Staples"), which operated a Staples Superstore at the premises. Staples always timely paid its rent and complied with all of the other provisions of the lease. But the Original Tenant had filed for bankruptcy on three separate occasions: 1995, 1998, and 2000 (whether the landlord had notice of any of these filings -- as required by the lease -- was disputed).
Staples renewed the lease several times, the last being on February 5, 2005. The landlord claimed that shortly after the last renewal, it first learned of the bankruptcy filings by the Original Tenant, and it thereupon exercised its right to terminate pursuant to the tenant-bankruptcy provision contained in the lease (granting the landlord the right to terminate within a "reasonable time" if the bankruptcy filing wasn't discharged within 90 days).
Staples argued that the termination was improper because: (1) the Original Tenant had filed for bankruptcy after the lease had been assigned to Staples and Staples was at all times financially solvent; (2) Section 365(e) of the Bankruptcy Code (which prevents termination of a lease due solely to the insolvency or financial condition of the debtor-tenant) rendered the anti-bankruptcy provision in the lease unenforceable; and 3) the landlord waived its right under the anti-bankruptcy provision because it knew or had reason to know of the Original Tenant's bankruptcy filings and failed to take any action to terminate the lease within a reasonable time (as required by the lease).
The court, in holding for Staples, relied solely on no. (1) above, finding that Staples had shown a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the merits and that the equities were in its favor (the case was initiated by Staples as a request for a preliminary injunction pending mandatory arbitration as required under the lease). The court, while acknowledging that the issue was not entirely settled in New York, agreed with the holding in a prior New York case with "remarkably similar circumstances" that "[h]ad the parties intended that the bankruptcy of the named tenant, although out of possession, could terminate the lease, they could have easily have so stated in the lease or modification agreement." The court chose not to follow a contrary New York ruling "given the clear state policy against lease forfeiture and its drastic remedy."
Reporter’s Comment 1: This was a state court decision and not a bankruptcy court decision, but Staples certainly had a valid argument that, in any event, an ipso facto bankruptcy provision in a lease (granting the landlord the right to automatically terminate a lease if a bankruptcy proceeding is filed by or against the tenant) is void under the Bankruptcy Code and as a matter of public policy. There is no indication in the state court case as to whether the Original Tenant attempted to assume or reject the lease in its bankruptcy proceeding(s), or whether it even considered the lease to be part of the bankruptcy estate. (Pursuant to the assignment agreement executed by the parties, "nothing in this agreement shall relieve [the Original Tenant] from liability for performance under the Lease, and [Original Tenant] agrees to remain bound to the Landlord under the terms of the Lease").
Reporter’s Comment 2: There are certainly some drafting lessons here. Staples would have been wise to have obtained a specific non-disturbance and attornment agreement from the landlord as part of the lease-assignment agreement executed by the parties. To further protect its interest, Staples also, as part of the lease-assignment agreement, could have obtained the exclusive right to make the election under sec. 365(h) of the Bankruptcy Code to assume or reject the lease in the event of the Original Tenants' bankruptcy (assuming the lease was deemed to be part of the Original Tenant's bankruptcy estate).
The Reporter for this item is Jack Murray of First American Title Insurance, Chicago office.
Items reported here and in the ABA publications
are for general information purposes only and
should not be relied upon in the course of
representation or in the forming of decisions in
legal matters. The same is true of all
commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT
list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed
are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor
and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.
Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to
source that is readily accessible by members of
the general public, and should take that fact
into account in evaluating confidentiality
DIRT is an internet discussion group for serious
real estate professionals. Message volume varies,
but commonly runs 5 15 messages per work day.
Daily Developments are posted every work day.
subscribe, send the message
subscribe Dirt [your name]
To cancel your subscription, send the message
signoff DIRT to the address:
for information on other commands, send the
Help to the listserv address.
DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes
commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon
residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find
this service more valuable, it is named “BrokerDIRT.” But residential
specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the
residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you
subscribe to BrokerDIRT, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as
BrokerDIRT carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.
To subscribe to BrokerDIRT, send the message
subscribe BrokerDIRT [your name]
To cancel your subscription to BrokerDIRT, send the
signoff BrokerDIRT to the address:
DIRT is a service of the American Bar
Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and
the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School
of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by
Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC
School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants
permission for copying or distribution of Daily
Developments for educational purposes, including
professional continuing education, provided that
no charge is imposed for such distribution and
that appropriate credit is given to Professor
Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.
DIRT has a WebPage at:
Your e-mail address will only be used within the ABA and its entities. We do not sell or rent e-mail addresses to anyone outside the ABA.
To change your e-mail address or remove your name from any future general distribution e-mails you can call us at 1-800-285-2221, or write to: American Bar Association, Service Center, 321 N Clark Street, Floor 16, Chicago, IL 60610
If you are an ABA member, log in to the ABA Web site at https://e2k.exchange.umkc.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.abanet.org/abanet/common/MyABA/home.cfm to edit your member profile. Otherwise, complete the form located at https://e2k.exchange.umkc.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=https://www.abanet.org/members/join/coa2.html
To review our privacy statement, go to https://e2k.exchange.umkc.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.abanet.org/privacy_statement.html.
If you have any problems, please contact the list owner