Reporter's Comment: Though it is not part of the opinion it appears that this case is one between "grumpy old men". The mailbox had been present in its same place at least twenty years and possibly close to fifty years. Taylor testified that it had not been a problem for thirty years. Now, however, he felt that it was a hazard to vehicular traffic in general and to him in particular. The Gajewskis had already secured a restraining order against Taylor prior to the instant court's finding that the three necessary elements for a prescriptive easement had been met. The court deferred any findings on safety issues to those having jurisdiction over the road.
Editor's Comment: This case demonstrates the flexibility available to courts with regard to a doctrine as apparently "objective" in character as prescriptive rights. The concept of "hostility" is open to manipulation. For instance, in other cases, where there was less justification for continued use of the mailbox, a court might find that the use of the mailbox over the preceding fifty years had been merely "permissive" - a neighborly accomodation - and that no prescriptive rights arose.
Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last five years, these Reports annually have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into the Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1-5, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. Contact Shawn Kaminsky at the ABA. (312) 988 5260.
Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.