Daily Development for Monday, November 25, 2002

 

By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Elmer F. Pierson Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
prandolph@cctr.umkc.edu

 

LANDLORD/TENANT; TERMINATION; SURRENDER:   Binding surrender contract is formed by oral acceptance of a written offer.

 

Morton's of Chicago v. Crab House 746 N.Y.S.2d 317 (A.D. 2 Dept. 2002).

 

The tenant sent the landlord a written offer of termination.  The landlord verbally accepted the tenant's offer, followed by written acceptance on the same day. The following day the tenant faxed a revocation of  the offer.

It arrived at landlord's office apparently before tenant received landlord's letter accepting the termination.

 

The lease provided that "any notice, demand, request or other document or instrument which may be or is required to be given under this lease, shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered when received or first refused."

 

Tenant took the position, apparently, that the written acceptance of the termination was not effective until received, and that by that time it had withdrawn the offer to terminate.   It must have believed this a lot, because the ultimate damages for tenant's holdover amounted to over $400,000.

 

Landlord brought action against tenant seeking declaration that its oral acceptance of tenant's written offer to terminate the lease was valid.  The court agreed.  Ordinary contract law provides that an acceptance of offer is effective upon dispatch, and a contract springs into existence at the time of mailing.  Although the lease required notice of termination to be in writing, effective upon receipt, the lease language did not apply to the acceptance of tenant's offer of termination.  Because the oral acceptance occurred prior to tenant's attempt to revoke its offer, the court reasoned, the termination was valid.

 

Comment: The decision is correct, but the court may have lost sight of the fact that the landlord's written acceptance in fact was vital, because an executory contract to surrender a lease is an agreement normally within the Statute of Frauds.  Nevertheless, since the lease did not apply to the acceptance, the landlord's execution of the acceptance of the surrender was effective upon mailing, thus satisfying any requirement for a writing.

Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.

Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org

Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.

Daily Developments are posted every workday.

To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Dirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Dirt

For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named "Brokerdirt." But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Brokerdirt

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.

DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/