by: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; CERCLA: CERCLA applies retroactively and may, consistent with the Commerce Clause, be applied against a party even where the disposal of hazardous substances is limited to the confines of that party's own property.
United States v. Olin Corp., 107 F.3d 1506 (11th Cir. 1997).
In a case that has attracted national attention, the Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded a decision of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama that had dismissed CERCLA claims against a company that disposed of hazardous substances "on-site" prior to CERCLA's enactment. The district court had departed from nearly sixteen years of unbroken precedent by holding, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244 (1994), that CERCLA could not be applied retroactively. In addition, it had held that, under the Supreme Court's 1995 decision in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), it would violate the Commerce Clause to apply CERCLA to the "on-site" disposal of hazardous substances.
The Eleventh Circuit reversed on both issues. It held that CERCLA's language, purpose and legislative history demonstrated "clear congressional intent" in favor of retroactive application, and thus met the Landgraf test. It further held that on-site waste disposal "substantially affects interstate commerce" and therefore satisfied the Commerce Clause test under Lopez.
Reporter's Comment: The district court decision had led many CERCLA defendants to begin asserting, as defenses, that CERCLA was unconstitutional and not retroactive. The Eleventh Circuit's decision will likely diminish this practice.
Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1-6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Stacy Walter at the ABA. (312) 988 5260 or email@example.com
Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.