Daily Development for

Friday, June 4, 1999

 

By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
prandolph@cctr.umkc.edu

 

Another important and provocative case from Jim Stillman:

 

BANKRUPTCY; JURISDICTION; FORECLOSURE OF NON DEBTOR; LEASEE DEBTOR: Although a mere tenant of the mortgaged premises, the debtor had such a stake in the outcome of the foreclosure action that it was properly considered a "core proceeding."  The Bankruptcy Court did not err in refusing to remand or abstain, and the circumstances did not warrant granting the landlord leave to appeal the interlocutory order denying remand or abstention.

 

 In re Jackson Brook Institute, Inc., 227 B.R. 569 (D. Maine 1998).  

 

The landlord pointed out that the debtor was not the borrower, not the owner of the mortgaged premises, and was protected by a non-disturbance agreement from the mortgagee regardless of the outcome in foreclosure. Hence, the removed foreclosure action was noncore, and the bankruptcy court should have abstained under section 1334(c), the landlord argued.   But by keeping the foreclosure action in the bankruptcy court, the debtor's right to cure, assume and assign the valuable lease would be protected, the court concluded, a right that has no analog under state law.  On the basis of its practical impact on the liquidation of the assets of the estate, the proceeding should be considered "core" under section 157(b)(2)(O).

 

Reporter's Comment: Cases, such as In re Comcoach Corp., 698 F.2d 571, hold that the automatic stay in a tenant's case operates to restrain foreclosure against a landlord for the purpose of preserving the leasehold.  Then the reverse should be true, the landlord argued here: the bankruptcy court should exercise no jurisdiction, where the tenant was "protected" by a non-disturbance agreement from the mortgagee.  Of course, the landlord's argument was disingenuous, because it was the landlord who wanted to boot out the defaulted tenant and needed a state law forum in which to do so. On the other hand lies the rule that jurisdiction cannot be founded on the attractiveness of a remedy.  There is also the chance that the "landlord" was not what he appeared: without overtly ascribing mortgage-law significance to its observation, the District Court notes twice that the debtor's lease contained a "mandatory offer to purchase" the premises at the end of the term.  This is a common feature of financing leases, sale lease-backs, and hidden secured transactions generally.  If the landlord was in economic effect a third-party financier, and not a true owner, then everyone got what he deserved. 

 

Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.

Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org

Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.

Daily Developments are posted every workday.

To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Dirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Dirt

For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named "Brokerdirt." But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Brokerdirt

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.

DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/