Daily Development for Tuesday, June 8, 1999

 

By: Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.
Professor of Law
UMKC School of Law
Of Counsel: Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin
Kansas City, Missouri
prandolph@cctr.umkc.edu

 

Another from Senn, Lewis

 

EMINENT DOMAIN; LEASES; ALLOCATION OF AWARD:  Even though a lease between parties contained a termination clause stating that the lease would terminate as of the date of total condemnation, lessees' right to a portion of the condemnation proceeds was not automatically extinguished since the lease contained an additional provision addressing the allocation of the condemnation award between the parties. 

 

Musser v. Bank of America, 964 P.2d 51 (Nev. 1998).  

 

In 1996 McCarran International Airport condemned two parcels of land in order to construct two airport runways.  Both of the condemned parcels were leased for the operation of mobile home parks for a period of 49 years. The owners of the land and the lessees were in dispute as to the apportionment of the condemnation proceeds.  The owners alleged that the leases provided that they were entitled to the entire condemnation proceeds, while the lessees alleged that they were entitled to a portion of the proceeds.  The lease contained a provision for automatic termination upon total condemnation but also contained a provision addressing allocation between the parties to the lease in the event of total condemnation.

 

The Supreme Court of Nevada stated that when there is a termination clause in a lease without accompanying language addressing the allocation of a compensation award then the termination clause is sufficient to bar a lessee's claim to a portion of such award.  However in this case, the lease contained additional language setting forth the allocation of any condemnation award.  Therefore, the court felt that to allow the automatic termination clause to bar lessee's claim to a portion of the condemnation award would be in effect dismissing a part of the contract by not giving the allocation provision of the lease any effect.  The court concluded that the lessees were entitled to a portion of the condemnation proceeds to be distributed pursuant to the allocation provision of the lease.  

 

Readers are urged to respond, comment, and argue with the daily development or the editor's comments about it.

Items in the Daily Development section generally are extracted from the Quarterly Report on Developments in Real Estate Law, published by the ABA Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law. Subscriptions to the Quarterly Report are available to Section members only. The cost is nominal. For the last six years, these Reports have been collated, updated, indexed and bound into an Annual Survey of Developments in Real Estate Law, volumes 1‑6, published by the ABA Press. The Annual Survey volumes are available for sale to the public. For the Report or the Survey, contact Maria Tabor at the ABA. (312) 988 5590 or mtabor@staff.abanet.org

Items reported here and in the ABA publications are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon in the course of representation or in the forming of decisions in legal matters. The same is true of all commentary provided by contributors to the DIRT list. Accuracy of data and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the DIRT editor and are in no sense the publication of the ABA.

Parties posting messages to DIRT are posting to a source that is readily accessible by members of the general public, and should take that fact into account in evaluating confidentiality issues.

ABOUT DIRT:

DIRT is an Internet discussion group for serious real estate professionals. Message volume varies, but commonly runs 5 ‑ 10 messages per workday.

Daily Developments are posted every workday.

To subscribe to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Dirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Dirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Dirt

For information on other commands, send the message Help to the listserv address.

DIRT has an alternate, more extensive coverage that includes not only commercial and general real estate matters but also focuses specifically upon residential real estate matters. Because real estate brokers generally find this service more valuable, it is named "Brokerdirt." But residential specialist attorneys, title insurers, lenders and others interested in the residential market will want to subscribe to this alternative list. If you subscribe to Brokerdirt, it is not necessary also to subscribe to DIRT, as Brokerdirt carries all DIRT traffic in addition to the residential discussions.

To subscribe to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Subscribe Brokerdirt [your name]

To cancel your subscription to Brokerdirt, send an e-mail to:

To:

ListServ@listserv.umkc.edu

Subject:

[Does not matter]

Text in body of message

Signoff Brokerdirt

DIRT is a service of the American Bar Association Section on Real Property, Probate & Trust Law and the University of Missouri, Kansas City, School of Law. Daily Developments are copyrighted by Patrick A. Randolph, Jr., Professor of Law, UMKC School of Law, but Professor Randolph grants permission for copying or distribution of Daily Developments for educational purposes, including professional continuing education, provided that no charge is imposed for such distribution and that appropriate credit is given to Professor Randolph, DIRT, and its sponsors.

DIRT has a WebPage at: http://www.umkc.edu/dirt/